King
United States v. King
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 99-10478 Plaintiff-Appellee, 01-10720 v. D.C. No. NORMAN ANTHONY KING, aka Norm CR-95-00197-VRW Northern District King; aka Norman August Klause, Defendant-Appellant. of California, San Francisco
ORDER
Filed August 16, 2005
Before: Susan P. Graber, Raymond C. Fisher and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In this case, we affirmed the judgment of conviction on December 23, 2002. The mandate issued on March 11, 2003. The Supreme Court denied certiorari on June 2, 2003. On August 9, 2004, defendant-appellant King filed a pro se motion “requesting amendment to [the] mandate and remand for resentencing” in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). We construe this motion as a motion to recall the mandate, and deny it.
We will recall a mandate only “in extraordinary circum- stances.” Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 550 (1998) (power to recall mandate is “one of last resort, to be held in reserve against grave, unforeseen contingencies”).…