Fidler
United States v. Fidler
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-50444 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-05-00335-ABC-
SHELDON FIDLER,
Defendant-Appellant. OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted Submitted July 21, 2005* San Francisco, California
Filed August 16, 2005
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*This case was decided without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 27(e).
10775 UNITED STATES v. FIDLER 10777
COUNSEL
Jill K. Ginstling, Deputy Federal Public Defender, and Myra Sun, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defend- 10778 UNITED STATES v. FIDLER er’s Office, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant- appellant.
Ellyn Marcus Lindsay, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney’s Office, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.