Dunlap
Dunlap v. Cpa
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN DUNLAP, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, No. 03-56511 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-02-02393-BTM
CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION,
OPINION
L.P.,
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 7, 2005—Pasadena, California
Filed August 16, 2005
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
10703 DUNLAP v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOC’N 10705
COUNSEL
Robert L. Arleo, New York, New York, and Jeffrey P. Fink, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Stephen H. Turner, David J. Kaminski, and Joseph R. Zamora, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiff-appellant John Dunlap claims that the use of the name, “Credit Protection Association,” in the context of a debt collection letter, violates various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The…