Dunlap

Dunlap v. Cpa

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 200503-56511California975 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DUNLAP, on behalf of himself  and all others similarly situated, No. 03-56511 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-02-02393-BTM

CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION,

OPINION

L.P.,

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2005—Pasadena, California

Filed August 16, 2005

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

10703 DUNLAP v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOC’N 10705

COUNSEL

Robert L. Arleo, New York, New York, and Jeffrey P. Fink, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Stephen H. Turner, David J. Kaminski, and Joseph R. Zamora, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-appellant John Dunlap claims that the use of the name, “Credit Protection Association,” in the context of a debt collection letter, violates various provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.