Hirschfeld
Hirschfeld v. Payne
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICHARD JOSEPH HIRSCHFIELD, No. 04-35437 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-01-00264-TSZ
ALICE PAYNE,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 22, 2005* Seattle, Washington
Filed August 22, 2005
Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, M. Margaret McKeown, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain
*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
11135 11138 HIRSCHFIELD v. PAYNE
COUNSEL
Michael Filipovic, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Seattle, Washington, argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant; Laura Mate was on the briefs.
John J. Samson, Attorney General’s Office, Olympia, Wash- ington, argued the cause for the respondent-appellee; Chris- tine O. Gregoire, Attorney General, was on the brief.