Garcia-Ramirez

Garcia-Ramirez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 26, 200502-73543California10,567 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARGARITA GARCIA-RAMIREZ, 

Petitioner, No. 02-73543 v.  Agency No.

A75-268-464

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,* OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted February 9, 2004—Seattle, Washington

Filed August 26, 2005

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Raymond C. Fisher and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Fisher; Concurrence by Judge Gould

*Alberto Gonzales is substituted for his predecessor, John Ashcroft, as Attorney General of the United States, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2).

11645 GARCIA-RAMIREZ v. GONZALES 11649

COUNSEL

Manuel F. Rios, Rios Cantor, P.S., Seattle, Washington, for the petitioner.

Anthony P. Nicastro, Office of Immigration Counsel, Wash- ington, D.C., for the respondent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner Margarita Garcia-Ramirez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), affirming without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.