Beck

Beck v. Fort James Corp. (In Re Crown Vantage, Inc.)

Good Law
421 F.3d 963·2005 WL 2077551
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 200504-16443, 04-16547California5,001 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

The parties in this case appeal and cross-appeal the order of the district court vacating an injunction issued by the bankruptcy court. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

I

The success of an industry often depends on generating demand for its goods, so it is perhaps not surprising that litigation in the paper manufacturing industry would require a prodigious quantity of its product. This appeal concerns a small, but nonetheless important, cogwheel in the legal machinery of the Crown Vantage, Inc. bankruptcy, which itself was a byproduct of various corporate organizational fabrications and deconstructions.

Through a series of mergers and acquisitions, the James River Corporation (“James River”), a publicly-held corporation, ultimately became the successor in interest to such business entities as the Crown-Zellerbach Corporation and the Northern Paper Mills Company. James River, in turn, merged with the Fort Howard Paper Company to form the Fort James Corporation (“Fort James”). Fort James was eventually acquired by the Georgia-Pacific Corporation, but this development would not occur until years after the events that form the basis of our story.

In 1995, James River decided…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.