Prasoprat

Prasoprat v. Benov

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 200503-57253California2,832 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In 1998, a confidential informant reported to an agent of the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) that Prasoprat was involved in heroin trafficking between Bangkok, Thai- land, and Los Angeles.2 The DEA monitored Prasoprat for several years and, in 2001, the United States filed a complaint in the United States District Court on behalf of the Govern- ment of the Kingdom of Thailand, seeking Prasoprat’s extra- dition to Thailand pursuant to the extradition treaty between the United States and Thailand. The complaint alleged that 1 The holding in Cornejo-Barreto I was disapproved of by Cornejo- Barreto v. Siefert, 379 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 2004) (“Cornejo-Barreto II”). The en banc court, however, later vacated Cornejo-Barreto II and denied the government’s request to vacate Cornejo-Barreto I. Cornejo-Barreto v. Siefert, 389 F.3d 1307 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc). 2 The details of the DEA’s investigation are not pertinent to this appeal because Prasoprat does not challenge the finding that there was probable cause that he committed the offense. 11980 PRASOPRAT v. BENOV Prasoprat and another individual were wanted in Thailand for drug offenses that are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.