Paulet De Flores v. Holder

Good Law
367 F. App'x 758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 23, 201006-75572California140 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Trinidad Marilu Paulet De Flores, Juan Aurelio Flores Lazo, Juan Alonso Flores Paulet, and Emily Flores Paulet, natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir.2004), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the petitioners’ untimely motion to reopen because the motion failed to pres ent materially changed circumstances in Peru. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(3)(ii); see also Malty, 381 F.3d at 945 .

Petitioners’ remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.