Bpa

Bpa v. Ferc

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 200502-70262California9,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKeown 12270 BONNEVILLE POWER v. FERC, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, 

Petitioner,

CITY OF TACOMA; PORT OF SEATTLE;

CORAL POWER, L.L.C.;

CONSTELLATION ENERGY COMMODITIES

GROUP, INC., No. 02-70262 Intervenors,  FERC No. v. EL00-95-001

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY

COMMISSION,

Respondent,

PACIFICORP,

Respondent-Intervenor. 

12263 12264 BONNEVILLE POWER v. FERC

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER 

COOPERATIVE, INC.; DYNEGY POWER

MARKETING, INC.; DUKE ENERGY

NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DUKE ENERGY

TRADING AND MARKETING, LLC,

(COLLECTIVELY, “DUKE ENERGY”); EL

PASO MERCHANT ENERGY L.P.;

METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; WILLIAMS No. 03-70185

ENERGY MARKETING & TRADING

COMPANY; RELIANT ENERGY POWER  FERC No. GENERATION, INC., Power Act Petitioners,

CORAL POWER, L.L.C.,

Intervenor, v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY

COMMISSION,

Respondent.  BONNEVILLE POWER v. FERC 12265

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 

COMPANY; CITY OF LOS ANGELES

DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.