Bpa
Bpa v. Ferc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 200502-70262California9,610 words
Opinion
Opinion
McKeown 12270 BONNEVILLE POWER v. FERC, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION,
Petitioner,
CITY OF TACOMA; PORT OF SEATTLE;
CORAL POWER, L.L.C.;
CONSTELLATION ENERGY COMMODITIES
GROUP, INC., No. 02-70262 Intervenors, FERC No. v. EL00-95-001
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION,
Respondent,
PACIFICORP,
Respondent-Intervenor.
12263 12264 BONNEVILLE POWER v. FERC
ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER
COOPERATIVE, INC.; DYNEGY POWER
MARKETING, INC.; DUKE ENERGY
NORTH AMERICA, LLC, DUKE ENERGY
TRADING AND MARKETING, LLC,
(COLLECTIVELY, “DUKE ENERGY”); EL
PASO MERCHANT ENERGY L.P.;
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA; WILLIAMS No. 03-70185
ENERGY MARKETING & TRADING
COMPANY; RELIANT ENERGY POWER FERC No. GENERATION, INC., Power Act Petitioners,
CORAL POWER, L.L.C.,
Intervenor, v.