Smith-Baltiher

United States v. Smith-Baltiher

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 200503-50375California6,879 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-50375 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-02-01867-BTM

GENARO SMITH-BALTIHER,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2004—Pasadena, California

Filed September 9, 2005

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Robert R. Beezer, and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt

12871 12874 UNITED STATES v. SMITH-BALTIHER

COUNSEL

Matthew C. Winter, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Carol C. Lam, United States Attorney; Roger W. Haines, Jr., Christopher M. Alexander, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, San Diego, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The issues presented include how courts should determine in a criminal proceeding whether a defendant is a citizen or an alien and whether a good faith belief that one is a citizen is enough to defeat a charge of attempted illegal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.