Flores-Montano

United States v. Flores-Montano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 14, 200504-50497California3,171 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50497 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-02-00536-IEG

MANUEL FLORES-MONTANO,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 10, 2005—Pasadena, California

Filed September 14, 2005

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Pamela Ann Rymer, and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

13241 UNITED STATES v. FLORES-MONTANO 13243

COUNSEL

Benjamin L. Coleman, Esquire, San Diego California, for the appellant.

Mark R. Rehe, Assistant United States Attorney, San Diego, California, for the appellee. 13244 UNITED STATES v. FLORES-MONTANO

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Manuel Flores-Montano appeals from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the resulting conditional-plea conviction for “illegal importation of mer- chandise” after border inspectors found thirty-seven kilo- grams of marijuana in the gas tank of his vehicle during a search of Flores-Montano’s vehicle as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.