United States v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Corporation

Good Law
460 F.2d 17·1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10204
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 10, 197271-1234California992 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lydick, J.

This is an appeal by the United States of America from a District Court order, 320 F.Supp. 648 , denying.it recovery under the California Uninsured Motorist Law and the terms of a policy of insurance issued by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to Willard J. Rogers and his wife. The United States seeks recovery of medical benefits paid by the United States to Mrs. Rogers as a serviceman’s wife under the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2651 et seq.

The facts, briefly stated, are: Hartford issued to Mr. and Mrs. Rogers, residents of California, an automobile liability insurance policy which included, as required by California law, a provision insuring against injury and damage sustained as the result of negligent acts of uninsured motorists. On May 14, 1967, while so insured, Mrs. Rogers, riding in a car driven by her husband, was injured in an automobile accident caused by the negligence of an uninsured motorist. On January 24, 1968, Hartford made a settlement with Mrs. Rogers paying her $9,950.00 of its total policy exposure of $10,000. Mrs. Rogers was entitled to and received medical care and treatment from the United States valued at $1,968.26. On April 16,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.