Bautista

Bautista v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 201007-73305California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GINA BAUTISTA, No. 07-73305

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-051-447

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 16, 2010 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gina Bautista, a native and citizen of the Phillippines, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to

reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945

(9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.