Bautista
Bautista v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 201007-73305California286 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FEB 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GINA BAUTISTA, No. 07-73305
Petitioner, Agency No. A096-051-447
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Gina Bautista, a native and citizen of the Phillippines, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JT/Research discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Malty v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 942, 945
(9th Cir. 2004), and we deny the petition for review.