Tapia Garcia v. Holder

Good Law
367 F. App'x 858
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 201007-71972California221 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Enrique Tapia Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence. Gui v. INS, 280 F.3d 1217, 1225 (9th Cir.2002) (adverse credibility determinations); Cortez-Acosta v. INS, 234 F.3d 476, 481 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (factual findings supporting removability). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Tapia Garcia was removable for alien smuggling where the record contains the smuggled alien’s sworn statement affirming that Tapia Garcia obtained a fraudulent entry visa for her, and that she was paying him to drive her across the border. See Altamirano v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 586, 592 (9th Cir.2005) (requiring “some form of affirmative assistance to the

illegally entering alien”). Moreover, substantial evidence supports the agency’s decision to credit the sworn statement and Officer Rodriguez’s testimony over Tapia Garcia’s inconsistent and implausible testimony concerning whether he confronted the smuggled alien while they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.