Roe
Jackson v. Roe
Opinion
Opinion
Berzon, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRED JAY JACKSON, No. 02-56210 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-00-11975-DT
ERNEST C. ROE, Warden,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 11, 2005—Pasadena, California
Filed September 23, 2005
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Berzon
13649 JACKSON v. ROE 13651
COUNSEL
Gretchen Fusilier, Carlsbad, California, for the petitioner- appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General of the State of California, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Brad D. Levenson, Deputy Attorney General, and Alene M. Games, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for the respondent-appellee. 13652 JACKSON v. ROE
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Fred Jackson filed a “mixed” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas cor- pus petition. The district court refused to stay…