Negrete Rosila v. Holder

Good Law
368 F. App'x 746
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 201007-74685California133 words

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Pablo Negrete Rosila and Ma. Magdalena Garcia Alvarez, spouses and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Perez v. Mukasey, 516 F.3d 770, 773 (9th Cir.2008), we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Petitioners’ motion to reopen where the new evidence they presented did not support prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.