Cortez-Arias

United States v. Cortez-Arias

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 29, 200504-10184California4,002 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gould, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-10184 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. CR-03-00192-

JOSE EMILIO CORTEZ-ARIAS,  HDM/VPC

Defendant-Appellant. ORDER AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2004—San Francisco, California

Filed April 18, 2005 Amended July 14, 2005 Second Amendment September 30, 2005

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Gould

13701 UNITED STATES v. CORTEZ-ARIAS 13703

COUNSEL

Robert B. Walker, Carson City, Nevada, for the appellant.

Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Robert Don Gifford, Assistant United States Attorney, Reno, Nevada, for the appellee.

ORDER

The opinion filed on April 18, 2005 and published at 403 F.3d 1111, as previously amended on July 14, 2005 at 415 F.3d 977, is AMENDED as follows.

Footnote 8 states: 13704 UNITED STATES v. CORTEZ-ARIAS Because Cortez-Arias waived all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.