United States v. Gregory Powderface

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 1, 201009-30295California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30295

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:04-cr-00056-SEH

v.

GREGORY MORRIS POWDERFACE, MEMORANDUM *

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Gregory Morris Powderface appeals from the nine-month sentence imposed

following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JC/Research Powderface contends his nine-month sentence is substantively unreasonable

because prison alone does not serve the sentencing purposes of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.