Charlotte's Office Boutique v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 200504-71325California4,970 words
Opinion
Opinion
Callahan, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARLOTTE’S OFFICE BOUTIQUE,
INC.,
No. 04-71325 Petitioner-Appellant, v. Tax Ct. No. 5077-
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
OPINION
REVENUE,
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from a Decision of the United States Tax Court
Argued and Submitted July 11, 2005—Seattle, Washington
Filed October 7, 2005
Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Richard A. Paez, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Callahan
13945 13948 CHARLOTTE’S OFFICE BOUTIQUE v. CIR
COUNSEL
Petitioner-appellant was represented by Robert E. Kovacevich of Spokane, Washington.
Respondent-appellee was represented by Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Clark, and Regina S. Moriarty of Washington, D.C.
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
On its face, this is an appeal by Charlotte’s Office Bou- tique, Inc., from the Tax Court’s determination that its royalty payments to Charlotte Odell, one of its two shareholders, were actually wages and that appellant was liable for employ- ment taxes on those wages and penalties. This appeal, how- ever, also raises a challenge to the Tax…