Bradley
Bradley v. Henry
Opinion
Opinion
NOONAN, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NICOLE BRADLEY, No. 04-15919 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-03-03034-PJH GLORIA HENRY, Warden, ORDER AND Respondent-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 11, 2005—San Francisco, California
Filed June 22, 2005 Amended October 17, 2005
Before: Warren J. Ferguson, John T. Noonan, and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Noonan; Concurrence by Judge Ferguson; Dissent by Judge Rymer
14135 14138 BRADLEY v. HENRY
COUNSEL
Dennis P. Riordan, San Francisco, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
Morris Beatus, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, Cali- fornia, for the respondent-appellee.
ORDER
The opinion filed on June 22, 2005 is amended as follows:
Slip op. p. 7454, ¶ 1, l.4. Insert “potentially” before “capi- tal”.
Slip op. p. 7454, ¶ 2, l.6. At “executed”, substitute comma for period and add “if the prosecutor chose to seek the death…