United States v. Samuel Jackson
369 F. App'x 791
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 201008-10566California292 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 04 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10566
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 07-cr-00917-GMS
v.
MEMORANDUM *
SAMUEL DEAN JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 16, 2010 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Samuel Dean Jackson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 96-month
sentence for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and his
guilty-plea conviction and consecutive 84-month sentence for use of a firearm in a
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
SR/Research crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),…