United States v. Samuel Jackson

Good Law
369 F. App'x 791
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 201008-10566California292 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 04 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-10566

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 07-cr-00917-GMS

v.

MEMORANDUM *

SAMUEL DEAN JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Dean Jackson appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 96-month

sentence for armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and his

guilty-plea conviction and consecutive 84-month sentence for use of a firearm in a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

SR/Research crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.