United States v. Roosevelt Newton
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 4, 201008-50421California251 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 04 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 08-50421
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00814-GAF
v.
MEMORANDUM *
ROOSEVELT ROY NEWTON, AKA
SEAL B, AKA Birdman, AKA Bird,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 16, 2010 **
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Roosevelt Roy Newton appeals from the denial of his motion pursuant to
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduced sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
SR/Research 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Newton’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.…