Rausch

Rausch v. Hartford

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 200503-35695California11,536 words

Opinion

Opinion

REINHARDT, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JASON RAY REYNOLDS; MATTHEW 

RAUSCH,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 03-35695 v.  D.C. No.

HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES CV-01-01529-AJB

GROUP, INC.; HARTFORD FIRE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees. 

AJENE EDO, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, No. 04-35279 Defendant, D.C. No. and  CV-02-00678-AJB

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE ORDER AND

COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY AMENDED

COMPANY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES OPINION

INSURANCE COMPANY, Subsidiaries of Geico corporation, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 8, 2005—Portland, Oregon

14451 14452 REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES Filed October 3, 2005 Amended October 24, 2005

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Dissent by Judge Bybee REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.