Rausch
Rausch v. Hartford
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 24, 200503-35695California11,536 words
Opinion
Opinion
REINHARDT, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JASON RAY REYNOLDS; MATTHEW
RAUSCH,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, No. 03-35695 v. D.C. No.
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES CV-01-01529-AJB
GROUP, INC.; HARTFORD FIRE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees.
AJENE EDO,
Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY, No. 04-35279 Defendant, D.C. No. and CV-02-00678-AJB
GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE ORDER AND
COMPANY; GEICO INDEMNITY AMENDED
COMPANY; GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES OPINION
INSURANCE COMPANY, Subsidiaries of Geico corporation, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Anna J. Brown, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 8, 2005—Portland, Oregon
14451 14452 REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES Filed October 3, 2005 Amended October 24, 2005
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Marsha S. Berzon, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Reinhardt; Dissent by Judge Bybee REYNOLDS v. HARTFORD FINANCIAL…