Omer

United States v. Omer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 31, 200503-30513California5,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 03-30513 v.  D.C. No.

TIMOTHY W. OMER, CR-03-00009-DWM

Defendant-Appellant. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 03-30544 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CR-03-00009-DWM

TIMOTHY W. OMER,

ORDER

Defendant-Appellee.  Filed October 31, 2005

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Judge Graber

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc, but the request failed to receive a majority of votes of the non- recused active judges in favor of en banc rehearing. 14863 14864 UNITED STATES v. OMER The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehear- ing en banc are DENIED.

GRABER, Circuit Judge, with whom KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN, BYBEE, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.