Notash

Notash v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200503-72116California2,990 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Notash was admitted to the United States in October 1997. The Notice to Appear charged that Notash committed the offense of attempted entry of goods by means of a false state- ment, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 542.1 Notash conceded the conviction. His sole contention is that the conviction was not for a crime involving moral turpitude; therefore, that the con- viction did not render him deportable pursuant to INA § 237(a)(2)(A)(i), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i).

At his hearing before the IJ, Notash explained that, when completing his customs declaration form, he had left a line relating to foreign goods blank because he was not sure how to declare the items. Customs officials thought that he was attempting to avoid payment of duty on the goods and charged him under 18 U.S.C. § 542. Notash, however, paid the duty and received the items back.

Notash thus argued that his conviction was not for a crime involving moral turpitude. He contended that, although crimes involving fraud generally are considered to involve moral tur- pitude, crimes involving false statements are not categorically considered to involve moral turpitude. He further argued that, unlike cases involving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.