Chaker

Chaker v. Crogan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 2, 200503-56885California7,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARREN DAVID CHAKER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 03-56885 v. ALAN CROGAN; SAN DIEGO  D.C. No.

CV-00-02137-BTM

PROBATION DEPARTMENT; PEOPLE OF

OPINION

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondents-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 6, 2004—Pasadena, California

Filed November 3, 2005

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Harry Pregerson, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Pregerson

15095 15098 CHAKER v. CROGAN

COUNSEL

Walter K. Pyle, Berkeley, California, for the petitioner- appellant.

Kelly M. Rand, Deputy District Attorney, San Diego, Califor- nia, for the respondents-appellees.

Mark D. Rosenbaum (argued), Alan L. Schlosser, Los Ange- les, California, and Daniel P. Tokaji (briefed), Columbus, Ohio, for ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, ACLU of Southern California and ACLU of Northern California.

Everett L. Bobbitt (briefed), Bobbitt & Pinckard, San Diego, California, for El Cajon Police Officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.