Rosas

Rosas v. Nielsen

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 3, 200504-16039California2,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ROSAS,  No. 04-16039 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. 01-0809-LKK

JAMES NIELSEN,

OPINION

Respondent-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 16, 2005* San Francisco, California

Filed November 4, 2005

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John R. Gibson,** and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

15123 15126 ROSAS v. NIELSEN

COUNSEL

Miguel Rosas, Vacaville, California, in pro se, for the petitioner-appellant.

Constance L. Picciano, Deputy Attorney General, Sacra- mento, California, for the respondent-appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Miguel Rosas petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that he was improperly denied…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.