Rosas
Rosas v. Nielsen
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MIGUEL ROSAS, No. 04-16039 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No. 01-0809-LKK
JAMES NIELSEN,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 16, 2005* San Francisco, California
Filed November 4, 2005
Before: Betty B. Fletcher, John R. Gibson,** and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.
15123 15126 ROSAS v. NIELSEN
COUNSEL
Miguel Rosas, Vacaville, California, in pro se, for the petitioner-appellant.
Constance L. Picciano, Deputy Attorney General, Sacra- mento, California, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Miguel Rosas petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that he was improperly denied…