Delaney

United States v. Delaney

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 200504-50128California1,127 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 04-50128 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-03-00080-MMM

DANIEL LUIS DELANEY,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 17, 2005* Pasadena, California

Filed November 7, 2005

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Harry Pregerson, and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Pregerson

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

15201 UNITED STATES v. DELANEY 15203

COUNSEL

Benjamin N. Gluck, Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks & Lincenberg, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellant.

Matthew D. Umhofer, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

On March 31, 2003, Defendant Daniel Luis Delaney robbed a branch of the Wells Fargo Bank in Anaheim Hills, California. On June 19, 2003, Delaney was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.