Clemens

Clemens v. U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 7, 200505-75631California2,417 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION*

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY L. CLEMENS, 

Petitioner, v. No. 05-75631

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE CENTRAL  D.C. No.

CR-05-00548-SJO

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondent, OPINION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Real Party in Interest.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 1, 2005** Pasadena, California

Filed November 7, 2005

Before: Thomas G. Nelson, Sidney R. Thomas, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel has determined that this disposition warrants publication, but that referring the case to an oral argument merits panel is not possible because the case involves exigent circumstances arising from an emer- gency motion and is a highly time-limited proceeding that cannot be resolved by reference to a merits panel. See G.O. 6.5(b)(i). **This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

15299 CLEMENS v. UNITED STATES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.