Price

MEMORANDUM

In these consolidated appeals, Arizona state prisoner Mark Steven Price appeals pro se from the district court’s judgments dismissing his two actions alleging violations of his constitutional rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000) (dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir.2005) (interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (g)). We affirm in part and dismiss in part.

In Appeal No. 06-15071, the district court properly dismissed Price’s due process claim challenging the deprivation of property and the disciplinary proceedings against him, because he was afforded the procedural protections set forth in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 563-70 , 94 S.Ct. 2963 , 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974).

In Appeal No. 06-15073, the district court properly dismissed Price’s equal protection and due process claims because there is a rational basis for the government’s fee requirement for an application to register intellectual property. See Rodriguez v.,Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1179-80 (9th Cir.1999) (applying rational basis test to equal protection…