Ash

In Re: Thomas Moldo v. Ash

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 17, 200503-57164California1,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

Debtor acquired legal title to a condominium located in Van Nuys, California in 1997, and executed a quitclaim deed conveying the condominium to Ash in 2000. The quitclaim deed was recorded on June 7, 2000. On February 28, 2001, Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of

IN RE: THOMAS 15461

Title 11 of the United States Code. Trustee subsequently filed an adversary proceeding against Ash, seeking to set aside the transfer of the condominium as fraudulent under California’s fraudulent transfer laws.

The bankruptcy court conducted a one-day bench trial on January 7, 2003. At the start of the trial, Trustee’s counsel clarified that Trustee would attempt to demonstrate fraudulent transfer on the grounds that Debtor was insolvent at the time of conveyance and did not receive equivalent value for the condominium; counsel stated that Trustee would not attempt to prove that Debtor actually intended to defraud his creditors. Immediately following the bench trial, the bankruptcy court rendered an oral decision in favor of Trustee, concluding that Trustee had demonstrated insolvency at the time of the trans- fer because Debtor’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.