E. Glasgow v. Michael Astrue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 11, 201008-35943California196 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 11 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

E. JOYCE GLASGOW, No. 08-35943

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:08-cv-00410-CRD Western District of Washington, v. Seattle

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, ORDER

Defendant - Appellee.

Before: GOULD and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ, * District Judge.

The memorandum disposition filed on December 29, 2009, is amended as

follows: On page 3, line 14, replace with .

On page 3, line 18, replace with .

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the

petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for

rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the

matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and the

* The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.