Gomes
Gomes v. Gonzales
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 200503-73683California1,569 words
Opinion
Opinion
Callahan, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARK STEPHEN GOMES; SWORNA No. 03-73683
JACINTA GOMES; METHEW GOMES,
Petitioners, Agency Nos. v. A70-641-041
A70-641-042
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A70-641-043 General,
OPINION
Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 15, 2005* Pasadena, California
Filed December 6, 2005
Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Barry G. Silverman, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Callahan
*The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argu- ment pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
15745 GOMES v. GONZALES 15747
COUNSEL
Garish Sarin, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioners.
Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, and John A. Nolet, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners, Mark and Sworna Gomes and their son, Methew, natives and citizens of Bangladesh and members of the Catholic faith, seek asylum or withholding of…