William Setzler v. City and County of San Francisco
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201009-15463California529 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM SETZLER, an individual, No. 09-15463
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-CV-05792-SI
v.
MEMORANDUM *
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2010 ** San Francisco, California
Before: HALL, NOONAN and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
William Setzler appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his
complaint. We affirm. Because the parties are familiar with the factual and
procedural history of this case, we will not recount it here.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1 The district court correctly concluded that, to the extent that Setzler’s
procedural due process claim is based on…