United States v. Enrique Hurtado

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201009-10035California599 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-10035

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. CR 08-00102-KJD-LRL

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ENRIQUE HURTADO, aka Enrique Hurtado Jiminez,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2010 ** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Defendant Enrique Hurtado was convicted in federal court on eleven counts,

including one count of bank robbery and one count of armed bank robbery,

U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), and one count of using a firearm during and in relation to a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A). He appeals the sufficiency of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.