David Putzer v. James Donnelly

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201009-17335California273 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID PUTZER, No. 09-17335

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00620-LRH-

VPC

v.

JAMES DONNELLY; et al., MEMORANDUM *

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010 ** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

David Putzer, a Nevada state inmate, appeals pro se the district court’s

denial of his request for preliminary injunctive relief against appellee prison

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). MVD/Inventory officials. Putzer seeks permission to attend a religious candle-lighting ceremony

held at the prison. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.