Daniel Griggs v. A. Teichert & Son
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201009-15084California628 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL GRIGGS, No. 09-15084
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-01117-JAM-
KJM
v.
*
A. TEICHERT & SON; TEICHERT MEMORANDUM
CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 28, 2009 ** San Francisco, California
Before: BEEZER, HALL and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Griggs appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in
favor of Teichert Construction, Inc. and A. Teichert & Son, Inc. (collectively
“Teichert”). We review the district court’s decision not to grant a Federal Rules of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Civil Procedure 6(b) motion for an…