Daniel Griggs v. A. Teichert & Son

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 18, 201009-15084California628 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 18 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL GRIGGS, No. 09-15084

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-01117-JAM-

KJM

v.

*

A. TEICHERT & SON; TEICHERT MEMORANDUM

CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 28, 2009 ** San Francisco, California

Before: BEEZER, HALL and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Griggs appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in

favor of Teichert Construction, Inc. and A. Teichert & Son, Inc. (collectively

“Teichert”). We review the district court’s decision not to grant a Federal Rules of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Civil Procedure 6(b) motion for an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.