Romel White v. Mike Martel
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 19, 201008-16387California1,160 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROMEL VALENTINO WHITE, No. 08-16387
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:06-cv-02840-JKS-EFB
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MIKE MARTEL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California James K. Singleton, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 9, 2010 San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner White appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his habeas
petition as untimely. We review a district court’s denial of a habeas corpus
petition de novo. Gonzalez v. Brown, 585 F.3d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 2009). We
have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. I.
The Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA) has
a one-year statute of limitations for habeas cases by persons in…