Jerden
Jerden v. Amstutz
Opinion
Opinion
Gould, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL JERDEN; CATRINA JERDEN, No. 04-35889 Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. D.C. No.
CV-02-03056-JPC
PAUL G. AMSTUTZ, M.D.,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon John P. Cooney, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 13, 2005—Portland, Oregon
Filed December 9, 2005
Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould
16115 16118 JERDEN v. AMSTUTZ
COUNSEL
Megan B. Annand, Law Office of Megan B. Annand, Med- ford, Oregon, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert L. Cowling (argued) and Benjamin M. Bloom, Cowl- ing, Heysell, Plouse, Ingalls & Moore, Medford, Oregon, for the defendant-appellee. JERDEN v. AMSTUTZ 16119
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
In this diversity case, Plaintiffs-Appellants Mr. Daniel and Ms. Catrina Jerden (“Plaintiffs”) brought a claim of medical negligence against Defendant-Appellee Dr. Paul G. Amstutz (“Defendant”) after Defendant, a neurosurgeon, mistakenly diagnosed Mr. Jerden as…