Doe

Doe v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 200505-17136California1,464 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION,  2003R01576 No. 05-17136

JOHN DOE,

Witness-Appellant,  D.C. No.

CR-05-90295-SI

v. OPINION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 5, 2005*

Filed December 8, 2005

Before: Alfred T. Goodwin, William A. Fletcher and Raymond C. Fisher, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16403

IN RE: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION 16405

COUNSEL

Rita Hao, Gonzalez & Leigh, LLP, San Francisco, California, for the appellant. 16406 IN RE: GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION Elise Becker, Office of the United States Attorney, San Fran- cisco, California, for the appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM

John Doe appeals the district court’s order holding him in civil contempt pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826. We have juris- diction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.