Albino

United States v. Albino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 200505-10146California461 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 05-10146 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CR-03-00417-DAE

EUGENE K. ALBINO,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii David A. Ezra, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 8, 2005* San Francisco, California

Filed December 15, 2005

Before: Melvin Brunetti, Alex Kozinski, and Barry G. Silverman, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16411 16412 UNITED STATES v. ALBINO

COUNSEL

Pamela J. Byrne, Assistant Federal Defender, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the appellant. UNITED STATES v. ALBINO 16413 Thomas Muehleck, Assistant United States Attorney, Hono- lulu, Hawaii, for the appellee.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Albino appeals the ten-year sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to growing 2,349 marijuana plants. Albino argues that 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) (A)(vii), which classifies 1000 or more marijuana…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.