Carty

Carty v. Nelson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 14, 200503-56766California6,775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JIMMY D. CARTY,  No. 03-56766 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-01-00721-IEG/ CRAIG NELSON, Warden; BILL JFS LOCKYER, Attorney General, ORDER Respondents-Appellees. AMENDING  OPINION AND

DENYING THE

PETITIONS FOR

REHEARING AND

REHEARING EN

BANC AND

AMENDED

 OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2005—Pasadena, California

Filed October 17, 2005 Amended December 15, 2005

Before: Harry Pregerson, Raymond C. Fisher, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Pregerson

16377 CARTY v. NELSON 16381

COUNSEL

Matthew D. Brown, CJA, San Francisco, California (argued); Christopher R.J. Pace, Cooley Goodward LLP, San Diego, California (briefed), for the petitioner-appellant.

Bradley A. Weinreb, Deputy Attorney General, San Diego, California, for the respondents-appellees.

ORDER

At slip op. 14213, change “the San Diego County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.