Ferrizz
Ferrizz v. Giurbino
Opinion
Opinion
Canby, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTHONY THOMAS FERRIZZ, No. 03-56137 Petitioner-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-02-05837-GLT
G. J. GIURBINO,
OPINION
Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 7, 2005—Pasadena, California
Filed December 23, 2005
Before: Harry Pregerson, William C. Canby, Jr., and Robert R. Beezer, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Canby
16663 FERRIZZ v. GIURBINO 16665
COUNSEL
Kenneth M. Stern, Woodland Hills, California, for the petitioner-appellant.
Timothy M. Weiner, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for the respondent-appellee.
OPINION
CANBY, Circuit Judge
Anthony Ferrizz appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Ferrizz contends that his state convictions violate due process because the jury’s guilty verdicts on two counts of the charges — burglary and grand theft of lost property — are factually inconsistent. We conclude that, in the…