Paul Wesbecher v. Stephen Landaker
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 201008-17051California243 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAUL A. WESBECHER, No. 08-17051
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:01-cv-02410-FCD-
DAD
v.
STEPHEN D. LANDAKER; et al., MEMORANDUM *
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Paul A. Wesbecher appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
KV/Research We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Whitaker v.
Garcetti, 486 F.3d 572, 579 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.