Paul Wesbecher v. Stephen Landaker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 25, 201008-17051California243 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 25 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL A. WESBECHER, No. 08-17051

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:01-cv-02410-FCD-

DAD

v.

STEPHEN D. LANDAKER; et al., MEMORANDUM *

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Frank C. Damrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 16, 2010 **

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Paul A. Wesbecher appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KV/Research We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Whitaker v.

Garcetti, 486 F.3d 572, 579 (9th Cir. 2007), and we affirm.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.