United States v. Paul Campos

Good Law
374 F. App'x 732
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 26, 201009-10120California732 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Bea has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Farris and D. Nelson so recommend.

The suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). The petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.

The memorandum disposition filed on February 22, 2010 is withdrawn. The attached memorandum disposition is filed in its place. Because the revised memorandum disposition contains no substantive changes, no further filings will be accepted in this closed docket. The clerk shall issue the mandate forthwith.

MEMORANDUM

Paul Lanakila Campos (“Campos”) appeals a judgment sentencing him to two years’ imprisonment for violation of the terms of his supervised release based on the district court’s finding that he committed bank robbery and fourth-degree theft. Campos contends this sentence was improperly based on the admission of hearsay evidence in violation of his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to confront witnesses against him at his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.