Teeples
United States v. Teeples
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 03-30307 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CR-02-00045-DWM
DAVID RAY TEEPLES,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed January 5, 2006
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, James R. Browning, and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion
59 UNITED STATES v. TEEPLES
COUNSEL
Melissa Harrison and John Rhodes, Assistant Federal Defend- ers, Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, Montana, for the defendant-appellant.
David G. Dennis and Joshua S. Van De Wetering, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Great Falls, Montana, for the appellee.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
This matter is before us after the United States Supreme Court vacated our earlier memorandum disposition and UNITED STATES v. TEEPLES 61 remanded for further consideration in light of its recent opin- ion in United States v. Booker, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005). In this appeal, David Ray Teeples challenges the district court’s determination that, on the basis of his two prior…