Lynn Hust v. State of Wyoming

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff-appellant Lynn Ann Hust (“Hust”) appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her suit in favor of thirty-one defendants-appellees. The district court dismissed the suit on several grounds, including the court’s refusal to interfere in an ongoing state criminal prosecution, Hust’s failure to comply with Wyoming and Washington tort claim filing statutes and Hust’s failure to comply with the applicable statute of limitations.

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

The facts of this case are known to the parties. We do not repeat them here.

I

We review “a judgment dismissing a case on the pleadings de novo.” Fairbanks N. Star Borough v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 543 F.3d 586, 591 (9th Cir.2008) (quoting Dunlap v. Credit Prot. Ass’n, L.P., 419 F.3d 1011 , 1012 n. 1 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam)). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, even if it was not relied upon by the district court. Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Serv., 329 F.3d 1089 , 1097 (9th Cir.2003).

We review a district court’s decision not to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims for an abuse of discretion. In re Digimarc Corp.…