United States v. Timothy Ruddle
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 201009-30189California250 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 09-30189
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:08-cr-00141-SEH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
TIMOTHY BRUCE RUDDLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Timothy Bruce Ruddle appeals from his 210-month sentence imposed
following a guilty-plea conviction for receipt of child pornography, in violation of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
GT/Research 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
Ruddle contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing
adequately to explain the sentence…