Taylor
Taylor v. Hamlet
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 29, 201008-15042California217 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALONZO L. TAYLOR, No. 08-15042
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-03-00592-MMC
v.
MEMORANDUM *
JIM HAMLET,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Alonzo L. Taylor appeals from the district court’s
order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EOH/Research Taylor contends that the district court erred when it determined that he
entered his guilty plea knowingly and voluntarily. Any error that may…