Jerden
Jerden v. Amstutz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 200604-35889California5,336 words
Opinion
Opinion
Gould, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL JERDEN; CATRINA JERDEN, No. 04-35889 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. CV-02-03056-JPC
PAUL G. AMSTUTZ, M.D., ORDER AND
Defendant-Appellee. AMENDED OPINION
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon John P. Cooney, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted September 13, 2005—Portland, Oregon
Filed December 9, 2005 Amended January 12, 2006
Before: Raymond C. Fisher, Ronald M. Gould, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Gould
575 578 JERDEN v. AMSTUTZ
COUNSEL
Megan B. Annand, Law Office of Megan B. Annand, Med- ford, Oregon, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
Robert L. Cowling (argued) and Benjamin M. Bloom, Cowl- ing, Heysell, Plouse, Ingalls & Moore, Medford, Oregon, for the defendant-appellee. JERDEN v. AMSTUTZ 579
ORDER
The opinion filed on December 9, 2005 and published at 430 F.3d 1231 is AMENDED as follows.